Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Necessity, philosophy: different kinds of necessity are distinguished, differing in their strength. For example, physical, logical or metaphysical necessity. See also necessity de dicto, necessity de re._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Richard Mervyn Hare on Necessity - Dictionary of Arguments
II 141 Necessity/Hare: can one say now that the dance "Eightsome Reel" is danced like this and not danced differently? No! No singular statement about an empirical fact is a necessity. (But a statement about a historical, contingent fact.) Unfortunately, there is also a temptation to name the corresponding statements synthetically or a priori. (Because there is, after all, a description of the correct dance.) >Syntheticity, >a priori, >Contingency, >Facts._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Hare I Richard Mervyn Hare The Language of Morals Oxford 1991 Hare II Richard M. Hare Philosophical discoveries", in: Mind, LXIX, 1960 In Linguistik und Philosophie, G. Grewendorf/G. Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1974/1995 |
||
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-28